What is a common characteristic of combination metes and bounds descriptions?

• A. They are easy to ascertain and survey
• B. They are the most comprehensive
• C. They can be easy to write but difficult to survey
• D. They require no further validation

Answer: (C)

Combination metes and bounds descriptions uniquely incorporate both natural and artificial landmarks or boundaries alongside precise distances and angles. This approach allows for a detailed representation of property lines, making it versatile for various terrains. While they can be easy to write because of the familiar terms used—like "north," "south," or reference to trees and rocks—translating those written descriptions into real-world surveys can be challenging. This complexity often arises from the need to interpret physical landmarks that may have changed over time or are not clearly defined, complicating the surveyor's task.

In contrast, while some may consider easy to ascertain and survey, or the lack of need for validation appealing, such promising attributes do not accurately describe the inherent difficulties presented by combination descriptions. The comprehensive nature generally indicates thoroughness rather than ease of interpretation in a practical context, enhancing the understanding of why option C stands out as the most accurate choice.